Thursday, August 29, 2013

In a World





                                                               


                 History is best told through words. When you hear the words “I have a dream” you are taken back instantly to the fight for civil rights. “Four score and seven years ago” takes you back to the civil war and finally “That’s one small step for man and one giant leap for mankind”. I have always loved quotes, because to me there is no better way to look at the great moments in the past, than to hear it from the people that lived it. I will say though, that all those words are great, but there are three words, to me that stand above them all, and no it is not “I love you”, those words are “In a World”
                  Those words were made famous by Don Lafontaine, a voice that most people would recognize as the “movie-trailer guy”. The voiceover world is a guy’s world, but what if a woman were to make it into that world?  That is the question Lake Bell dares to ask in a film that she not only stars in, but also wrote and directed. Carol (Lake Bell) is trying to get in the voiceover business, but is having a hard time getting into a world dominated by men. In the meantime she gives voice dialect lessons to help her get by financially.  During one such training session she gets a shot to do a voice over when a guy named Gustav (Ken Marino) doesn’t show up. Carol nails the job, which leads to more opportunities. Carol lives with her sister Dani (Michaela Watkins) and her husband Moe (Rob Corddry) because her father wants his younger girlfriend to move in with him. Her father Sam (Fred Melamed) is one of the greats of the voiceover world, and she not only longs for the industries approval, but that of her own fathers as well.
Now I know that sounds about as much fun as watching a bad “Baywatch” episode, but it’s not. In fact “In a World” will have you laughing more than some of the bigger comedies of the summer. Lake Bell just nails it in every way. You can tell she put a lot of love and effort in making this movie. You also get to see a part of Hollywood far removed from the glitz and glamour we picture when we think of that town. There are so many invisible people that fill our world with entertainment that we never see. Without voiceover work we would not have those 15 to 20 minutes of heaven we see before every movie we see. Now you get to see that world of the golden voices that tell us what one man is going to do or survive. “In a World” is just a fun and entertaining movie, which is very well written and is done as good, if not better than most of its more expensive counterparts. So do yourself a favor and discover a world where one woman makes a movie, that is a good as it gets.

 Brian Taylor



Monday, August 26, 2013

In Defense of Daredevil


To anyone who staked-out a Best Buy or Blockbuster back in the day on “New-Release-Tuesday” you know all about the difference between a regular edition of a movie and a special director’s cut.  For those that don’t know, it was usually that two-disc set that cost about five to six bucks more than the single disc version which only contained the theatrical cut of a movie.  For those extra dollars you got tons of special features, behind-the-scenes footage, director’s commentary, and a longer version of the movie.  I have “Avatar” on Bulray and it has 3 versions of the film, and I couldn’t tell you which is which or the difference between them, it’s all blue cats, giant trees, and Jake Sully to me.

Now rare is the director’s cut that is truly different from the theatrical cut.  Most of the time, adding 10 to 17 minutes doesn’t do much to change the story or the feel of the film.  On the short list are films like “Aliens”, “Lord of the Rings”, “JFK”, and “Watchmen”.  Then there are those that drastically alter what we remember seeing in the theater, those are films like “Blade Runner”, “Almost Famous”, “The Outsiders”, “Superman II” and “The Abyss”.

But there is no other film that was so different that it has virtually wiped the theatrical version from my memory and put in its place one of the best comic book movies.  2003’s “Daredevil”.  Written and directed by Mark Steven Johnson, starring Ben Affleck as Matt Murdock/Daredevil.

When most people saw this film in theaters they took it for what it was, a slightly darker and not-as-well-done version of the 2001 Spider-Man movie.  Matt Murdock is a tortured soul with a tragic Batman-like past.  With some pretty bad post “Matrix” CGI and even worse wire-work, the movie just didn’t play very well, especially having to fit into a PG-13 box.

The director’s cut unfortunately does nothing to the effects and can’t change some of the more silly moments, or the bad hair dye jobs on both young and older Matt Murdock.  What it does do well is tell a very good story that’s straight out of the comic books.  Pulling primarily from the Frank Miller work on the character in the 80’s and some nods to the Smith/Quesada run, we get a longer time with Matt and his father, almost 30 minutes.  There are silent moments, and some really good shots.  And it all sets up a deeper look into the everyday and sometimes heartbreaking life of this regular man with extraordinary abilities.

“Hey, that light.  At the end of the tunnel?  Guess what?  That’s not heaven… That’s the C train!”

When Affleck as Matt comes into the picture, he just feels like a broken man.  You see the scars, but this time you certainly feel his pain as he goes out in the night dispensing justice on criminals.  A big change for the character that you can see a studio’s hand in cutting is when Matt is turning in for the night after giving a beat down on a bar full of thugs.  He is getting into his sensory deprivation tank and hears a woman get shot, and feels her as if she’s in his room as she gasps her last breath.  When he realizes that there’s nothing he can do for her now, he lies back and sleeps.  Hardcore.  You would never see that in a superhero movie.  It was kinda done in “Spider-Man 2” but that was some guy getting mugged, this was death, and he knows he can’t save or even avenge everyone, he’s just one man.  A man raised Catholic by the way.  Something else you don’t really see, our heroes these days are usually good with a moral code, or maybe a little gruff with a strict sense of justice.  This Daredevil will allow people to be killed if he feels they deserve it.  

I’m gonna fill you in on a little secret, Matt.  This place doesn’t look like a law office, okay?  It looks like the set of goddamn “Sanford and Son”.  Every time I walk in here, I’m waiting for Lamont to walk down the stairs.”

A huge change in the flow of the film is a B-storyline that that was completely cut and has Matt and his partner Franklin ‘Foggy’ Nelson (Jon Faverau) investigating a case that involves one of their clients being framed for murder with possible connections to the Kingpin (Michael Clarke Duncan).  Yeah, their client is Coolio but the movie’s called “Daredevil”, it’s about that character and you do get that feel of that comic, how crimes are connected, there is more involvement with reporter Ben Urich (Joe Pantoliano), and it makes more sense when you see that Matt works in court by day and is jumping rooftops and roughing up crooked cops by night.  His exhaustion is felt as all of these events happen at once and Affleck’s performance is solid when you see all that he endures in this new order of scenes.

“I’m sorry…I have to go.”

Another adjustment that is only minor moments but have big consequences involves the Matt and Elektra’s story.  In the theatrical version it was meet, fight, make love by the fire, misunderstanding, and fight again.  This time, we see Matt as a slave to his dedication to street justice.  On the rooftop, in the rain, Elektra (Jennifer Garner) asks Matt to stay and instead of getting busy as I’m sure the studio wanted, Matt just leaves her there on the roof while he goes to kick the crap out of some random punk.  So it’s even more painful later in the cemetery, again, in the rain, when he asks her to stay with him and she leaves to find his alter-ego to kill him.  They never get to consummate their love, which makes the final outcome all the more tragic.

“Hey, orphan.  Let’s play.”

Lastly there is what really makes this cut deserve its “R” rating.  The violence is more graphic, there is plenty more profanity, there’s a lot more involving the Catholic Church, and a bit more on Matt’s mother.  The villains are more villainous.  You see the Kingpin kill a man with his bare hands.  Bullseye (Colin Farrell) is a lot more creepy and brutal, his fight with Elektra is longer and their final moment is straight out of a horror movie.  I get the sense that the actors read the script and saw the chances it was taking, and how different it was compared to comic book movies of the time, and what they would eventually evolve into.  The stakes are more basic here as well, there’s no saving the world from opening portals to other worlds.  It’s a guy trying to save his city from what will happen without him.

If you love superhero movies, it’s still not a perfect film with all that still had to be left in, but you can clearly see what it would have become with a braver studio behind it and some better effects, in the end it deserves a second chance.  Give it another watch and be a hero to one of the greatest heroes of all time, no I don’t mean Affleck.  I’m talking about the guardian devil, Matt Murdock.

--Robert L. Castillo  

Friday, August 23, 2013

Five Films to look Foward to in the Fall


          After a pretty weak summer movie season, the fall is upon us.  It can be the dump month and it can be the prequel to Oscar season.  Speaking of prequels I only see one coming in the fall by way of director Kenneth Branagh and starring Chris Pine (Star Trek) as a young Jack Ryan, the fifth in the series but pre-Alec Baldwin, Harrison Ford, and Ben Affleck.  Hey, if he could fill James T. Kirk’s shoes, he can fill Han Solo’s.  There are of course sequels abound, with Hobbit’s with plans to Desolate Smaug, “Insidious” spirits, “Riddick” with his spooky eyes, Jenifer Lawrence “Catching Fire”, and fan favorites Ron Burgundy and Machete, and heaven help us, Madea. Now normally I would site all these sequels as a bad thing if two of them were not on my list of five to look forward to.  Now on to the list.  With the help of some visuals.

1)    Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs 2 (Sept. 27)

If you’ve never seen the first Meatballs movie, you are sorely missing out on one of the best animated films of the past ten years.  The humor was so specific, subtle, and genius at times, yet still found a way to give you that heavy-handed message through the use of the Flint Lockwood Diatonic Super Mutating Dynamic Food Replicator (FLDSMDFR).  If the trailer is any indication, it looks to be a lot of that same humor, with or without some life lesson I look forward to fun with the food-animals.

2)     Gravity (Oct. 4)

Alfonso Cuaròn has only made a few films, but since 2001 he has been firing on all cylinders with “Y tu mamá también”, the best Harry Potter movie, and the still fantastic “Children of Men”.  Now the dude is going into space with Clooney and Bullock as his only cast? I’m so ready for this.

3)    Thor: The Dark World (Nov. 8)

Not my favorite of the Phase One Marvel films, but it has grown on me after multiple viewings.  Most of the best moments occur on Asgard, and it appears that the majority of the film will be set there.  Maybe the fate of Earth will be hanging in the balance, but leave that to Joss Whedon and “The Avengers 2: Age of Ultron”.  I wanna see some super-god action of ‘Game of Thrones’ like proportions. 

4)    Her (Nov. 20)

Spike Jones doesn’t have many films under his belt between all his shorts, documentaries, and “Jackass” stuff.  But his films are always something to behold.  His vision can carry a movie even something like his recent “Where the Wild Things Are” while not a great film, visually, it’s on another level.  Plus it’s one of my favorite James Gandolfini performances, and it was just his voice.  And now that Joaquin Phoenix is done pretending to be crazy and back to doing some great work, I look forward to their collaboration.  And come on, what guy wouldn’t want their house to talk and take care of them in the voice of Scarlett Johansson?

5)    The Secret Life of Walter Mitty (Dec. 25)

As a career daydreamer I am anticipating this movie like you read about.  The plot feels like the romantic-dramedy formula, but there is something in the mix that puts it a little off kilter, and I like what I see so far.  Ben Stiller was on his way down the Adam Sandler path, where you see him there and it’s like, “Hey, there he is, doing that same thing.” It’s funny.  But you don’t laugh.  It shouldn’t be that way.  Here Stiller looks to be taking some chances, and I do enjoy his directing choices more than his acting ones, so we’ll see if this is as great a film as the trailer makes it out to be.  

As with the fall season we also get those under the radar flicks that hit big, maybe Joseph Gordon-Levitt’s directorial debut “Don Jon” (Sept. 27).  Or  “12 Years a Slave” (Oct. 18) with the neglected for far too long Chiwetel Ejiofor.  It also could be Alexander Payne’s latest “Nebraska” (Nov. 22).  And of course the category of almost a sure thing we got David O. Russell’s “American Hustle” (Dec. 13).  There’s the Scorsese and DiCaprio combo of “The Wolf of Wall Street” (Nov. 15).  Jason Reitman’s “Labor Day” (Dec. 25).  And we’ll go out on my favorite brothers, the Coen’s with “Inside Llewyn Davis” (Dec. 6).

I don’t look forward to much this fall, but I hope for more surprises than the summer had to offer.

--Robert L. Castillo

Thursday, August 22, 2013

The World's End





                                                                     


              Everyone remembers the best night of their life. The one thing we all have in common with our best nights is that you never wanted it to end. You and your friends all have those stories, the ones we tell about that perfect night. Well I am going to assure you, that you and your friends don’t have a story like this group of guys. Well unless your story can top saving the world, all while making a pub run… didn't think so.
              Gary (Simon Pegg) was the cool guy in High School you wanted to be like. Good looking, fun, and didn't care about what anyone thought of him. Gary had a group of friends who followed him; there was Oliver (Martin Freeman), Steven (Paddy Considine), Peter (Eddie Marsan) and Andy (Nick Frost). In 1990 they tried to do the golden mile, a trip to twelve pubs ending at The World’s End. They did not make it, but it was still one of those nights you won’t forget. Flash forward twenty years later and Gary wants to finish what they couldn't finish twenty years earlier. Things have changed though, only Gary has remained the same, somehow he convinces the group to get to give it another try, and they head back home to finish the golden mile. Something about the town is different though, and not the normal time passage different, it is more like the town has been taken over by robots different. That doesn't stop Gary from wanting to complete what he came to do. All he and his friends have to do is fight the evil robots and make it to The World’s End.
             What is the perfect trilogy?  That can be an easy question to answer, if you think of a trilogy in the normal sense. Yeah you have trilogies like “Star Wars” “The Godfather”, and “The Matrix” series, but what about the ‘Cornetto’ Trilogy? Some of you may be asking what the ‘Cornetto’ trilogy is, well let me tell you. It is “Shaun of the Dead, “Hot Fuzz”, and the grand finale “The World’s End”. The series gets its name from Cornetto Ice Cream, which makes an appearance in all three films. The other thing all three films have in common is that they were all written by Edgar Wright and Simon Pegg and directed by Edgar Wright. You hope this is not the end of this perfect partnership, a partnership that goes back to 1999 on a great TV series called “Spaced”. It is really hard to not enjoy a movie like “The World’s End” a movie that provides you with everything you need, it is like the perfect balanced meal. It is easy to say “Edgar Wright has done it again”, but he really has. I implore you to go to your local cinema and watch one of the best movies of the summer and would make any day a perfect day. In fact the only thing that could make it any better, would be to enjoy a Cornetto, while you watch the perfect way to end the Cornetto Trilogy.

Brian Taylor



The Spectacular Now




                                                                   


              Growing up I always had a pretty utopian view on what being a teenager in high school would be like. Once I got there, it was nothing like what I had thought, and plus we had no kids that looked like James Spader. Just because high school was not like a John Hughes film didn't make it a bad thing, I just think I would have had more fun at those schools than mine. Now a day in the perfect world is not what people want, they want something real, and in “The Spectacular Now” it feels like what being a teenager feels like today.
              Now being a middle-aged man this is only a guess, but it sure feels right on. Sutter (Miles Teller) is that guy everyone likes, you know the life if any party. Sutter is enjoying every minute of high school, great times, and a great girlfriend named Cassidy (Brie Larson) to top it off. Sutter also likes to drink, and not the typical teenage drinking, he goes as far as carrying a flask and even putting alcohol in anything he drinks.  After Cassidy breaks up with him, Sutter drinks a little too much and ends up passed out in the front of a house, not his own. He is found by Aimee (Shailene Woodley), who knows Sutter from school. Sutter starts to gather interest in Aimee, but all the while hoping to land back with the women he thinks he wants in Cassidy. Aimee has never had a boyfriend and quickly starts to fall for Sutter hard. With school ending soon, Sutter is all about the now, and has no idea what his future will hold, he never wants to grow up, because where is the fun in that?
            A lot of people think that their high school years were their highest point in their life. I mean you have no worries, no responsibilities, you just live life. Everything is easier, including love because how innocent everything is.  Sutter and Aimee are at that point where things start to move, college and life are in front of them making them have to make choices they never had to before. Written by Scott Neustadter and Michael Weber (500 Days of Summer) from the book by Tim Tharp, the story is a real coming of age story. I know that is a bad description, but where so many coming of age stories fail, this one soars. It is all perfectly directed by James Ponsoldt (Smashed), who set the movie in his home town of Athens, Georgia, and even shot the film in locations he grew up in. It all comes together by the flawless performances by Woodley and Teller who are perfect for each other on screen. I sometimes think what it would be like to grow up in this day and age, well I think I just got to see what life is like today and like this movie it looks spectacular.

  Brian Taylor 

                    

Blue Jasmine





                                                             


                I have always been a fan of consistency. It is something that is so hard to achieve in life and most of us are always looking for it.  In Hollywood, it’s almost impossible. There are plenty of consistent things in life though, things like the sun coming up, The Simpsons, the Cubs not winning a world series, and of course a Woody Allen movie coming out. Since 1977 Woody Allen has released at least one movie every year. Another amazing thing is that a majority of them are really good. So here we are in 2013, and what is Woody offering us this year?
             “Blue Jasmine” is another in a long line of great Woody Allen films.  Jasmine (Cate Blanchett) is having a rough time. You see Jasmine was married to Hal (Alec Baldwin) and they had it all. They lived the life of the rich and famous, you know what some people call the perfect life. Hal loves Jasmine, but Hal also loves other women and is always trying something new. Something happens though, and Jasmine is forced to move to San Francisco to live with her sister Ginger (Sally Hawkins). Jasmine has lost it all, and has nothing left, just her clothes from her previous life of being rich. Jasmine is not right and is having a nervous breakdown as she gets accustomed to living life with no money. Her sister Ginger wants to help her, even though she didn’t treat her well when Jasmine did not need her. Jasmine though cannot forget the past, but must find a way to do so in order for her to move on with her life.
            There are many reasons to love a Woody Allen film. You know it will have great dialogue, amazing locales, and great stories about relationships. For the last few years Allen has given up staring in his films, but has never stopped writing himself in a role. Blanchett plays Allen as good as Allen ever has. She has neurotic down perfectly and Jasmine wouldn't be played the same by many other people. I think Allen has the relationship between a man and a women figured out. I say that because that relationship always plays a central role in all his movies, and they don’t feel made up, they feel real. Allen also always finds the perfect actors for his movies, not everyone can do a Woody Allen Film. “Blue Jasmine” is no different, with great roles by Baldwin, Blanchett, Hawkins, and Andrew Dice Clay, yes that one. Allen seems like he has hit his stride again, and is really making movies as good as anything he has ever done. So grab your significant other, go to one of those theaters that serve wine, and sit back and enjoy another film by one of the greatest storytellers in movie history.

 Brian Taylor


Wednesday, August 21, 2013

The Mortal Instruments: City of Bones




                       
                                                                 


               They say imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. Since the success of the Harry Potter series, publishers and studios alike have been searching for the next billion dollar franchise. Lighting did strike again with Stephanie Meyer’s Twilight series, but for every success like that there is a lot more failures like “The Golden Compass” and “Beautiful Creatures”. How do you know if you got a hit or miss?  Well there are only two outcomes, a bomb and you move on, or you can print your own money all the way to Gringott’s (Harry Potter joke). The question arises, what will “The Mortal Instruments” be?
           The story is your usual young adult novel world. It evolves around a girl, a couple boys fighting for her love, and of course supernatural beings. Clary (Lily Collins) is pretty much your typical teenage girl. Her mother Jocelyn (Lena Headley) is always trying to protect her like a good mother, but she is also hiding something from her as well. Clary can see things that regular people cannot, and not in the “I am crazy” way. Clary finds out that she is a shadowhunter, or someone who fights demons. She can’t remember everything, because someone cast a spell on her to help block her memories. Clary meets Jace (Jamie Campbell Bower) who is also a shadowhunter as well, and who help explain to her as well as the audience the world she is entering. Together, they must stop the mortal cup from falling into the wrong hands.  Yep, there’s a mortal cup.
        It has to be a hard thing to follow success. Not because it can’t be duplicated, but because too often it looks like you are just copying what came before you. Ever since Harry Potter, everyone wanted to ne second in the success on the page and the big screen. When “Twilight” hit, you had the all too familiar forbidden love story, typical conflict if you know vampires and werewolves. With “The Mortal Instruments” you are dealing with a lot of the same formula, even down to the afore mentioned vampires and werewolves. I mean at least the main characters are not the next Bella and Edward, but at times during the film I was trying to figure out if I was on team Jacob or Edward, before I realized “wrong movie”. In no way is “The Mortal Instruments” a rip off of “Twilight”, it is just not much different, they take place in what seems like the same world. I know I am the wrong audience for this film, I mean I am not an 8 to 16 year old girl. Everyone in this movie looks like they stepped out on the latest issue of YM, and I don’t mean that in a good way. Fans of the book series may enjoy this movie, as well as people who like to look at “pretty” people emote. For the rest of us out there, this just isn't our cup of tea. This, in my mind, will go down as another miss in the elusive search for that next franchise that takes the movie world by storm, in other words, this franchise will probably shuffle loose this ‘mortal’ coil long before they can reach the end of their series on film.

Brian Taylor





Tuesday, August 20, 2013

Justice League: The Flashpoint Paradox


          With the superhero explosion on film, Marvel has the lead horse in the race, even with DC’s version of Dark Knight and Superman bringing in the big bucks, Marvel just had a better game plan and even better execution with their “Phase One” films including Iron Man, Captain America, Thor, and of course The Avengers.  So when it comes to the big screen Marvel, for the moment and foreseeable future is king.  However, on the small screen, in particular the direct-to-video films, DC is dominating both in style and in content.  With films like “Justice League: New Frontier”, “Batman: Under the Red Hood”, “All-Star Superman” and the most recent “Dark Knight Returns” films based on the masterworks by Frank Miller DC has been turning out some pretty great animated work.
 



Even the films that falter a little like “Wonder Woman”, “JLA: Doom”, and “Batman: Year One” (which by the way has a pretty awesome voice-over by Bryan Cranston as Jim Gordon) they still have some great moments and are worth at least one viewing.  What always works for me, even if they are doing an adaptation of a really good comic book story I appreciate the animation style and voice cast to tell their stories.  The latest is also based on a comic series, the last of which that was done before the ‘New 52’ reboot of the DC universe, “Justice League: The Flashpoint Paradox” just “Flashpoint” in the comics.  It tells the story of the Flash/Barry Allen who wakes up in a world where he is no longer a hero with super speed, Batman carries a gun, Superman is nowhere to be found, and Aquaman and Wonder Woman are at war destroying half the planet in the process.  As he tries to find out who is responsible for this alternate reality, he fights to stay alive and tries to be the hero he was always meant to be.
Now after the big talk-up I gave the entire DC animated films that would probably lead one to believe that I’m about to give ‘Flashpoint Paradox” a glowing review.  But I’m not.  The film is kind of a mess, but with some high points.  First off the animation is very anime style, which looks good when there’s action, but the rest of the time not so much.  The narrative drags a little and the explanation for why things are the way they are is a bit confusing, even for a cartoon based on a comic logic.  The violent action is pretty hardcore, it’s a few hack-slashes and curse words away from a “R” rating.  You do get to see some great moments from the Flashpoint series, like what happened with Bruce Wayne and his family, some of the Superman stuff, and a fantastic opening action scene with the Justice League and even better closing scene with Flash and Batman voiced by the only Batman I hear in my head when I read a comic, the twenty year veteran Kevin Conroy.  And who doesn’t love them some Nathan Fillion as Green Lantern every once and a while?  You get glimpses into some storylines I wished they devoted more time to.  I really like seeing my favorite 90’s character Grifter in the mix.  But that’s what most of the film feels like.  I big mixer of things and ideas that are never really fleshed out in the end.  Maybe it’s because the changes are not earned or that you need previous knowledge of these characters for you to care enough to follow them, or it could be that this particular story is not as interesting as others.  Either way the movie is worth a watch but doesn’t have that re-watch factor that the other DC animated films have.
It is almost worth it just for the opening and closing bookends of the piece.  So if you want to see some of your favorite heroes doing some things they’ve never done before, you may like what “Flashpoint Paradox” has to offer.  The sneak peek for the next DC animated film is on the disc as well, but it’s in the New 52 vein which is a verion of the Justice League origin.  I feel I’m done with the origin stories. I am still just waiting for animated versions of some of my favorite stories, “Identity Crisis”, “Arkham Asylum”, “The Killing Joke” and “Kingdom Come”  Let’s go DC, give the fans what they want.


 
--Robert L. Castillo    

Thursday, August 15, 2013

Kick Ass 2





                                                                   


        In 2010 a movie came out that instantly became one of those “have you seen it” movies. It was easy to lose for most people, because it was another movie based off a comic book. It was not like most comic book movies, well maybe a little like Batman, only if he was in high school and had no money, wait that’s Spider-Man.  Anyway “Kick Ass” was about a regular teenager who wanted to fight crime. No special powers, just a green scuba suit, a couple batons and a can do attitude.
     The reason “Kick Ass” was so fun, was because it combined action and comedy and did it in the right way, mostly due to director Matthew Vaughn. Sometimes capturing lighting in a bottle twice can be a hard thing to do, and not many movies franchises have pulled it off. David Lizewski/Kick-Ass (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) doesn't wear his Kick Ass costume to often anymore. He has just become your average high school senior trying to figure out his life. Meanwhile Mindy/Hit-Girl (Chloe Grace Moretz) knows what she wants to do with her life, that is continue what her and her father did before his untimely death. Kick-Ass decides he wants to get back to being a super hero and starts to train with Hit-Girl, so that they can become the new dynamic duo. Kick-Ass soon finds other guys like himself, who wear a costume to help keep the streets clean. Chris D’Amico (Christopher Mintz-Plasse) still wants revenge on Kick-Ass for blowing up his father with a bazooka. So D’Amico forms a group of bad guys, which sets up the ultimate good vs. evil battle royale.
       “Kick-Ass 2” will be enjoyed by a certain group of people. The kind that enjoy over the top violence and of course the comic book series itself. While not as good as the first one, “Kick-Ass 2” has enough good moments to make the movie still fun. Gone is Matthew Vaughn, who did such a great job with the first film. He is replaced by Jeff Wadlow, who does not quite live up to Vaughn’s shadow. While “Kick-Ass” relied on humor just as much as action, Wadlow, ups the action and cuts back on the laughs. In fact most of what laughs are generated are provided by Mintz-Plasse. The Flow of the movie gets thrown off a little as Hit-Girl tries to fit in at school and is taken in by the “cool” girls, who of course only try and embarrass her. The best part of the film, are the fight scenes, which get more elaborate as the movie progresses. “Kick-Ass” was one of those movies that I would have been happy with just the one. I think just because something is popular, you don’t always have to make another. With that said, “Kick-Ass 2” is a good movie on its own, but just doesn't kick as much ass as the original.

Brian Taylor
    


Wednesday, August 7, 2013

Elysium


Most of the great works of science fiction take place on a spaceship, another planet, or in the case of the new Neil Blomkamp film, a dystopian future where instead of a wall separating two countries, it’s the space between a diseased-ridden Earth and the distant but visible Mercedes-Benz logo looking space station, “Elysium”.

On Elysium the haves, have it all, beautiful houses, beautiful children, and even little MRI machines that cure whatever ails you, be it broken arm or life-threatening disease.  The have-nots back on Earth live a hard life not to dissimilar from the one that Blomkamp portrayed in his previous film, the fantastic “District 9”.  Instead of the oppressed aliens in Johannesburg, this time it’s a whole planet.  On this Earth, in the ruins of  L.A. in the year 2154 lives Max (Matt Damon) an ex-con with the heart of gold, which we’re told in way too many flashbacks that he is special.  On Elysium Jodie Foster runs the show as a government official who keeps the floating paradise safe by killing all who try to enter.

When all too convenient circumstances bring Damon and Foster in opposition the movie really picks up, with a few stops to introduce Alice Braga’s character and fits her and her story like a familiar puzzle piece into the narrative.  That is the major drawback on the film aside from the constant reminders of rich is bad and poor is good, is that everything feels all too convenient.  Characters who all know each other or who only have one degree of separation between the main cast.  Plus if you know sci-fi, or even movie logic, you will see everywhere the movie takes you well before you get there.

The performances keep you engaged enough, mostly though through the slightly ‘off’ character Kruger played fittingly by Sharlto Copley.  What really stood out to me was the world building and the incredible, I mean really incredible visuals.  From the robot police to the simple 30-plus year effect of a ship flying in space, the visual effects artists really made a beautiful looking film.  Writer/Director Blomkamp still needs some work on his storytelling and his fight scenes.  Or maybe he shouldn’t have got the steady-cam crew from Damon’s “Bourne” movies to shoot a lot of his action.

The classics of sci-fi almost always have some sort of social commentary as told through a fictional prism.  Who we are, what we are capable of, what we can do to ourselves as well as one another in a society with rules that are followed blindly.  Unfortunately “Elysium” is not one of those destined to be a classic, but it reminds you of the potential these types of films still have and gives me hope that Blomkamp can give us another one with his next film.

--Robert L. Castillo                   

Thursday, August 1, 2013

2 Guns




                                                             


             The right pairing of actors together can make or break a movie.  And since 1967 there have been buddy cop movies.  Now “In the Heat of the Night” is no “48 Hrs.” or “Lethal Weapon”, but the concept is the same.  Two cops or cons/cops with opposite styles, attitudes, and methods coming together for a common goal.  Well with “2 Guns” I think I found one of my favorite pairings in this genre and of the year, Wahlberg and Washington.
           I don’t know, maybe it has something to do with the screen play written by Blake Masters, or maybe it is the characters created by Steven Grant for his comic book series. I think it’s the combination of both, but it was Wahlberg and Washington who make it all come alive. Bobby (Denzel Washington) and Stig (Mark Wahlberg) are two criminals trying to work their way up the crime food chain. Unbeknownst to each other, both Stig and Bobby are undercover, trying to achieve the same goal. The goal is to bring down Papi Greco (Edward James Olmos), who is a drug kingpin. The way they decide to do so is to rob a bank that Greco has some money stashed away in. Instead of getting Greco’s money, Stig and Bobby rob the C.I.A of forty three million dollars. What follows is a lot of one-liners, and if the title didn’t give it away, a lot of gun fights.
       When it comes to the month of August, it is the place where the questionable movies go.  The not-good-enough-for-July dump bin if you will. They are questionable because they are not the “big” summer movies, but summer movies none the less. When it comes to “2 Guns” I think the studio got it right. This is the perfect movie to follow all those sequels and not so fun “big summer movies” (yes I am talking to you Lone Ranger). How about a fun movie with two actors that everyone loves? With plenty of action mixed in with just the right amount of comedy, this is the kind of movie I look forward to seeing. Mark Wahlberg makes the movie, and the reason is simple, he doesn’t play that guy he plays in almost every move he is in. You know the quiet but nice guy, who just looks tough. In “2 Guns” Walhberg plays a cocky bad ass, who is good at what he does and he lets you know it every chance he gets. Denzel on the other hand is just Denzel, which after saying that, I have said all I needed to say. Directed by Baltasar Kormakur, who makes a good version of a Michael Bay movie. This is a great choice if you are looking for something fun to do this weekend, because in my mind, you can never go wrong with a fun time at the movies.

Brian Taylor
       


The Smurfs 2


          A kid’s movie sequel usually follows the formula of the original.  Take what worked, no matter how little of it there was, and do more of it.  So in “The Smurfs 2” we get more of what the studio felt worked the first time around.  More Smurfette, more Gargamel, and more, oh, so much more smurfisms.  The less we get this time around is humans, in fact the only play they get here is heavy-handed lessons about family being what you make of it.  It’s even heavier than the excessive use of the Sony tablet.

Speaking of Sony, their doing okay on the animation front, even the films that don’t do well critically, like “Arthur Christmas” and the “Band of Misfit” pirate movie, they still manage to make a lot of money.  “The Smurfs 2” will probably be no different, if anything else it is a more simplistic plot compared to the first, which I didn’t really care for.

Actually, with fans always clamoring for all these intellectual properties to be more like the original comics or in this case cartoons, this movie is kind of reminiscent of the Saturday morning cartoon it was based on.  A misunderstanding causes one of the characters to believe something that is not true and leads them to do things that they would normally never do.  The specifics involve Smurfette (Katy Perry) and Gargamel (Hank Azaria) and Pappa Smurf played by Jonathon Winters as in his final role.  There is a poorly done parallel story involving Neal Patrick Harris’s character and Brendan Gleeson who was the only one who got me to chuckle with his line readings.  Harris felt like he was phoning it in.

All in all kids will enjoy this Smurf tale in all its blue butt glory.  For the adults, it will be kind of a chore to sit through, but its relatively painless once you get past all the smurf this and smurf that.  At least it wasn’t a big steaming pile of smurf.  Yeah, I couldn’t resist.

--Robert L. Castillo