Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Flashback 'Dark' Corner--In the Mouth of Madness


Even after years of watching “Poltergeist”, “The Howling” and “The Exorcist” through my fingers, there are still movies that do the job of scaring me when I watch them.  Now, it just borders on creeping me out, but the old fear and wanting to bring my hands up still lingers.  John Carpenter has already been sited here as a master of horror, though his later films haven’t shown this as much, he did have a film that hit most of the right horror notes.  This was 1994’s “In the Mouth of Madness”.

Sam Neil (Jurassic Park) is John Trent, an insurance investigator brought in to discover the whereabouts of famed horror fiction writer Sutter Cane played by Jurgen Prochnow who I always think of him as the bad guy from “Beverly Hills Cop II”.  Trent hired by Cane’s publisher, a surprisingly subdued performance by Charlton Heston and is sent to find the supposedly fictional town of Hobb’s End where he thinks the writer is holding the manuscript for his final book hostage.  A book series that has created rabid fans and an even more insane agent of Cane that has been driven to axe wielding.  When Trent and Cane’s editor the mostly drab and boring Julie Carmen find Hobb’s End after a eerie road trip, they stay at the local inn where paintings and old sweet ladies are not what they seem.  From here the movies goes all over the place, from weird, creepy, funny, disturbing, scary, and even delving into the meta, all leading up to a haunting and somewhat sad ending.

When I first saw this movie, which was intended to be the last of Carpenter’s “Apocalypse Trilogy”, the first two being “The Thing” and “The Prince of Darkness” you can see the similarities and the bleak tone of them all.  This one, though feels more like an unnerving piece of fiction mainly because of the meta aspect of it.  I had never seen a movie, where it flash forwards and backwards, that discusses elements of true horror and has moments that make you question reality.  I had read my share of Stephen King before seeing this movie, and I looked into the H.P. Lovecraft stories after seeing it.  You will notice many nods to the Cthulhu mythos, and even some of the creatures that look like it.  As well as the power of fiction, and how ideas can give birth to many horrible things if enough people read and believe.  The standout great exchange between Trent and Dr. Wrenn played by the great David Warner really sells what Carpenter is putting out there with the discussion of a book that can drive you crazy: “What about people who don’t read?”  “There’s a movie.”

Being a classic horror film you get the typical gags and jump-scares that Carpenter is famous for, but they still kinda work on some levels, even when you see them coming.  And Sam Neil really carries the film throughout.  His reactions and his transformations seem genuine. The other great part that gives it that classic feel, is that most of the effects are practical, this was when CGI was really taking off, and while Carpenter uses some of it, mostly it’s real moving and creepy, like the backwards hand-standing creature that still gives me chills.  And did I mention the mutant children and Hayden Christensen as the paperboy?  Chilling.  That and more is what makes this one of the great horror movies of 90’s.

 

--Robert L. Castillo       

No comments:

Post a Comment