Thursday, August 9, 2012

The Bourne Legacy


          It seems less like a trend now that every year we see more and more movies that fit in the category of remake, reboot, re-imagining, and flat out rip-offs.  It’s comforting to know that some filmmakers are really making an effort to at least adjust this way of making movies.  Paul Greengrass, director of the last two Bourne films and star Matt Damon decided not to go for a fourth round in the further adventures of Jason Bourne.  For this reason it fell to writer/co-writer of all three Bourne films Tony Gilroy to take up the challenge to make an interesting story set in the same universe.  Even more, setting the events in the same time frame as the last two Bourne films.  In short, he succeeded.

“The Bourne Legacy” starts off with secret agent in training Aaron Cross, played by Jeremy Renner (The Avengers) in Alaska surviving in the wild, battling wolves and taking mysterious little blue and green pills.  Meanwhile in the states the previous events involving Jason Bourne, and secret projects Treadstone and Blackbriar are playing out in the media as well as deep inside the government.  The players doing damage control this time around are led by Stacy Keach and Edward Norton, who both do a lot with little screen time almost always with their expressions.  They are in charge of trying to sweep the Bourne mess under the rug, the consequences of this involve shutting down similar programs.  As they start to eliminate spies in the field, as it does in these types of films, there is one agent that is not that easy to kill.  Jeremy Renner as Cross is very intense with a good soldier syndrome much like his character in “The Hurt Locker” only without the deathwish.  Rachel Weisz (The Mummy) is pretty good as the doctor who can help Cross get the answers he needs to survive.  She has several really good scenes where she becomes slightly unhinged as a woman involved in something bigger than her.  The film does takes a while to get going, which is its only drawback, but when Weisz and Renner get together, every scene is really solid, and the final minutes belong in the pantheon of chase scenes.

The one thing I noticed reading other reviews is the notion that this is not as good as the previous Bourne films.  That Renner lacks the charisma Damon brought to the role.  Both of these evaluations are true, but I didn’t go into this movie expecting to see Renner do his best Matt Damon impersonation.  That really would have been re-hashing horrible.  Director Tony Gilroy is not trying to make “Batman Begins” or “Casino Royale” those were dying franchises that needed new life.  The Bourne universe is big enough for both of these characters.  Renner has a sense of confidence and energy that is ever present on the screen.  He is a perfect fit for this series and I would love to see him and Damon in a future film together, because they are so different.  Maybe it was a mistake to only have 50% of the title be accurate, there is a ‘Legacy’ just no ‘Bourne’.  But that should not distract you from the great film that was put together here.  Most action movies are mindless, thoughtless underdone plots with set piece after set piece of seen it all before action.  Here we get a deeper action film, with characters you enjoy watching go through these intense moments, and we should be glad that some movies strive for more than just letting you get over-charged for popcorn while things explode for no reason.  There is reason here, and “The Bourne Legacy” is an action movie not to be missed.



--Robert L. Castillo      

No comments:

Post a Comment